An Inquiry into the Interaction between Rational Behavior Models in Conventional Economics and Rationality Theories in other Sciences

Authors

1 Professor, Research Institute of Hawzeh & University

2 Ph.D. candidate of Economics, Research Institute of Hawzeh & University and Faculty of Economics, Managmant & Accounting, Yazd University

Abstract

"Rational behavior" theory and its pertinent models in conventional economics which are dominated by neoclassical approach have suffered from certain shortcomings in terms of showing reality, explaining and predicting some of which have been resolved. The present study firstly intends to investigate whether using other sciences including philosophical, scientific, rational or experimental ones have been effective in tackling the deficiencies. Secondly, could such problems have been alleviated if the Islamic notions had been used? Hence, this interdisciplinary issue was investigated via a historical approach. Using library research as well as applying a descriptive-analytic approach, it firstly was revealed that the rational behavior theory is the product of analogical approach in philosophy which has made its way into different fields such as economics. Since the theory has been constructed on the basis of economic behavioral models, it is founded on various conventional issues emphasized in various fields of study. Yet, due to the emergence of certain doubts, the theory has been tested on different occasions the results of which were not confirmatory. Nonetheless, certain modifications have been successfully incorporated through other sciences. Secondly, one of the remaining deficiencies is its incapability in explaining altruistic behaviors known as "irrespective of self". Finally, given the fact that in the Islamic thought both "human self" and "natural self" have been prevalent for centuries, it is obvious that the conventional economics could not have considered self-sacrificing behavior as unjustified had it used the Islamic notions. Indeed, such a self-sacrificing behavior meets the “human self” need which are of higher priority. Therefore, it is evident that this rejection has roots in the divergence between rationality in conventional economics and Islamic rationality.

Keywords

بلاگ، مارک (1387)، روش شناسی علم اقتصاد: اقتصاددانان چگونه تبیین می­کنند،  ترجمه  غلامرضا آزاد، تهران: نشر نی.
جابری، علی (1388)، «علم اقتصاد متعارف و خودگروی لذت‌گرایانه»، معرفت اقتصاد اسلامی، سال اول، ش1، پاییز و زمستان 1388، صص163-184.
جعفری، محمد تقی (1362)، شناخت انسان در تصعید حیات تکاملی، تهران: امیرکبیر.
چپرا، عمر، آینده علم اقتصاد (چشم‌اندازی اسلامی)، ترجمه احمد شعبانی، تهران: دانشگاه امام صادق(ع).
خورسندی طاسکوه، علی (1387)، گفتمان میان‌رشته‌ای دانش: گونه شناسی، مبانی نظری و خط‌مشی‌هایی برای عمل در آموزش عالی، تهران: پژوهشکده مطالعات فرهنگی و اجتماعی، 1387.
دادگر، یداله و عزتی، مرتضی (1382)، «عقلانیت در اقتصاد اسلامی»،، فصلنامه پژوهش­های اقتصادی، ش 9 و 10، پاییز و زمستان 1382، صص1-24.
 رستمیان، علی و متوسلی، محمود (1386)، «گامی به سوی بازسنجی هرمنوتیکی نظریه انتخاب عقلایی»، تحقیقات اقتصادی، شماره 79، تابستان 1386، صص91-119.
شومپتر، جوزف (1375)، تاریخ تحلیل اقتصادی، ج1، ترجمه فریدون فاطمی، تهران: نشر مرکز.
صدیقی، محمد نجات اله (1384)،  آموزش علم اقتصاد از دیدگاه اسلامی، ترجمه محمدرضا شاهرودی، تهران: دانشگاه امام صادق (ع).
طاهر، سعید؛ غزالی، عیدیت و سید عقیل، سید عمر (1375)، مباحثی در اقتصاد خرد: نگرش اسلامی، ترجمه حسین صادقی، تهران: موسسه تحقیقات اقتصادی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس.
 الفاخوری، حنا و الجر، خلیل (1376)،  تاریخ فلسفه در جهان اسلامی، ترجمه عبدالمحمد آیتی، تهران: سازمان انتشارات و آموزش انقلاب اسلامی.
کرمی، محمد حسین (1375)، «مهمترین پیشفرض انسان شناختی»، حوزه و دانشگاه، شماره 9، صص71-83.
لاریجانی، محمد جواد (1377)، تدین، حکومت و توسعه، تهران: موسسه فرهنگی اندیشه معاصر.
مصباح یزدی، محمد تقی (1372)، جامعه از دیدگاه قرآن، قم: سازمان تبلیغات اسلامی.
مینی، پیرو (1375)، فلسفه و اقتصاد، ترجمه مرتضی نصرت و محمد حسین راغفر، تهران: انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی.
نوذری، حسینعلی (1381)، بازخوانی هابرماس، درآمدی بر آراء، اندیشه­ها و نظریه­های یورگن هابرماس، تهران: چشمه، چاپ اول.
هملین، آلن (1386)، اخلاق و اقتصاد، ترجمه افشین خاکباز و محمدحسین هاشمی،  تهران: پژوهشکده مطالعات فرهنگی و اجتماعی، چاپ اول.
 
Anand, Paul, Prasanta K. Pattanaik & Clemens Puppe (2009), The Handbook Of Rational & Social Choice, New York.Oxford University Press, first ed.
Axelsson, Runo (1973), "The Economic Postulate of Rationality, some Methodological Views", the Swedish Journal of Economics, Vol. 75, No. 3, pp.289-295.
Chartier, Gary (2009), Economic Justice and Natural Law, Cambridge University Press.
Fourgead, C.,  Gourleroux, C. & Pradel, J. (1980) "Learning Procedures and Convergence to Rationality", Econometrica, Vol. 54, No. 4, pp.845-868.
Habermas, Jurgen (1955), The Theory of Communicative Action: The Critique of Founctionalist Reason tr.Thomas Mc Carty, vol.2, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Id. (1971), Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science, and Politics, Trans, By Jeremy J. Shapiro, London: Heinemann.
Hargreaves, Heap & Shaun P. (2004), "Economic Rationality", in The Elgar Companion to Economics and Philosophy, John Davis B., Alain Marciano And Jochen Runde(eds), UK, Edward Elgar publisher pp.42-60.
Kahneman, Daniel (2003), "Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics", American Economic Review, Vol. 93, No. 5, pp.1449-1475.
Kamarck, Andrew (2005), Economics as a Social Science, an Approach to NonatisticTheory, University of Michigan Press. 
Machlup, Fritz (1978), Methodology of Economics and Other Sciences, London, Acadamic press.
Mc Fadden, Daniel (1998), Rationality for Economists?, California, University of California.
Rabin, Matthew (1998), "Psychology and Economics", Journal of Economic Literature, pp.11-46.
Rawls, John (1971), A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Mass: Harward University press.
Samuelson, Paul Anthony (1947), Fundations of Economic Analysis , Cambridge and London: Harward University press
Id. (1993), "Altruism as a Problem Involving Group Versus Individual Selection in Economics and Biology", American Economic Review, No. 83, pp.143-148.
Simon, H. A. (1947), Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision Making Process in Administrative Organizations, Chicago, IL: Macmillan, First Ed.
Id. (1955), "A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice", Quarterly Journal of Economics, No. 69, pp.99-118.
Steele, G. R. (2004), "Understanding Economic man: Psychology, Rationality and Values", American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Vol. 63, No. 5, p.1021.
Tomer, John (2008), "Beyond the Rationality of Economic Man, Toward the Rationality of Human Man", International Journal of Behavioural Accounting and Finance, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp.4-22.